
Plasmid copy number determinationPlasmid copy number is known to vary depending on origin of replication and culture conditions [refs]. Typically, plasmids are referred to in qualitative terms such as "High" "Low" "Single" copy yet the quantitative value can be altered with only slight/single bp changes in the origin of replication [refs] and dramatically alter both the per cell and population yield of other products coded on the plasmid [refs]. Here we describe 3 methods used in our lab and discuss advantages and disadvantages of each.OverviewRegardless of what method of is used to evaluate the plasmid copy number, all methods are limited by the DNA extraction method, and biological relevance of the sample when the DNA is extracted. To minimize bias in DNA extraction we recommend: never using a "plasmid prep" kit as these kits strongly favor isolation of plasmid DNA over genomic DNA, more? To maximize biological relevance we recommend isolating DNA under the same conditions as you are interested in or expect there to be a difference (stationary vs exponential growth; media choice; maintain antibiotic concentration; precondition cultures if reviving from frozen; do not grow/transfer more than required).Comparison of methods
Appropriately Culture CellsThe first 2 days of work, in getting cells to equilibrium are common to all analysis types. Additionally these 2 steps can be skipped if you are able to isolate cultures at biologically relevant times such as after transfers have been done in a serial transfer evolution experiment and do not need to revive cultures from -80° C glycerol stock.Day 1: Reviving Strains
Day 2: Precondition Cultures
Agarose Gel Density | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| > > | Lysis Buffer:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Day 3: Lyse cells and isolate DNA.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| > > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| < < |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| > > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deleted: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| < < |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Day 4: Gel electrophoresis. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| > > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| < < |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| > > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| > > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Added: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| > > |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Day 6: data analysis
Next Generation SequencingDay 3: DNA extractionDay 4: Library prepDay ?: Computational analysisqPCRThis protocol is based on methods described in Lee et al (2006), link to paper.Day 0: Design and Verify primers before isolating DNADesign your primers as outlined here. Once you have prepared genomic and plasmid DNA as below, verify by melt curve that your primers produce single products (typically a checkbox on the thermocycler software to run/report after the amplification steps). This can be done on any DNA containing both genomic and plasmid DNA.Day 1& 2: see Appropriately Culture Cells aboveDay 3separate page describing method candidate for consolidation -- Main.DanielDeatherage - 11 Oct 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plasmid copy number determinationPlasmid copy number is known to vary depending on origin of replication and culture conditions [refs]. Typically, plasmids are referred to in qualitative terms such as "High" "Low" "Single" copy yet the quantitative value can be altered with only slight/single bp changes in the origin of replication [refs] and dramatically alter both the per cell and population yield of other products coded on the plasmid [refs]. Here we describe 3 methods used in our lab and discuss advantages and disadvantages of each.Overview | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | Regardless of what method of is used to evaluate the plasmid copy number, all methods are limited by the DNA extraction, and biological relevance of the sample when the DNA is extracted. | |||||||
| > > | Regardless of what method of is used to evaluate the plasmid copy number, all methods are limited by the DNA extraction method, and biological relevance of the sample when the DNA is extracted. | |||||||
| To minimize bias in DNA extraction we recommend: never using a "plasmid prep" kit as these kits strongly favor isolation of plasmid DNA over genomic DNA, more? | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | To maximize biological relevance we recommend isolating DNA under the same conditions as you are interested in or expect there to be a difference (stationary vs exponential growth; media choice; maintain antibiotic concentration; precondition cultures if reviving from frozen; do not grow/transfer more than required) | |||||||
| > > | To maximize biological relevance we recommend isolating DNA under the same conditions as you are interested in or expect there to be a difference (stationary vs exponential growth; media choice; maintain antibiotic concentration; precondition cultures if reviving from frozen; do not grow/transfer more than required). | |||||||
Comparison of methods | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | in progress | |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | Agarose Gel Density | |||||||
| > > | Appropriately Culture Cells | |||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | The first 2 days of work, in getting cells to equilibrium are common to all analysis types. Additionally these 2 steps can be skipped if you are able to isolate cultures at biologically relevant times such as after transfers have been done in a serial transfer evolution experiment and do not need to revive cultures from -80° C glycerol stock. | |||||||
Day 1: Reviving Strains
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
Day 2: Precondition Cultures
| ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > |
Agarose Gel Density | |||||||
Day 3: Lyse cells and isolate DNA.
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | ||||||||
Day 4: Gel electrophoresis.
| ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | ||||||||
Day 6: data analysis
Next Generation Sequencing | ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | Day 3: DNA extractionDay 4: Library prepDay ?: Computational analysis | |||||||
qPCR | ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | This protocol is based on methods described in Lee et al (2006), link to paper.
Day 0: Design and Verify primers before isolating DNADesign your primers as outlined here. Once you have prepared genomic and plasmid DNA as below, verify by melt curve that your primers produce single products (typically a checkbox on the thermocycler software to run/report after the amplification steps). This can be done on any DNA containing both genomic and plasmid DNA.Day 1& 2: see Appropriately Culture Cells aboveDay 3 | |||||||
| separate page describing method candidate for consolidation -- Main.DanielDeatherage - 11 Oct 2020 | ||||||||
Plasmid copy number determinationPlasmid copy number is known to vary depending on origin of replication and culture conditions [refs]. Typically, plasmids are referred to in qualitative terms such as "High" "Low" "Single" copy yet the quantitative value can be altered with only slight/single bp changes in the origin of replication [refs] and dramatically alter both the per cell and population yield of other products coded on the plasmid [refs]. Here we describe 3 methods used in our lab and discuss advantages and disadvantages of each.OverviewRegardless of what method of is used to evaluate the plasmid copy number, all methods are limited by the DNA extraction, and biological relevance of the sample when the DNA is extracted. To minimize bias in DNA extraction we recommend: never using a "plasmid prep" kit as these kits strongly favor isolation of plasmid DNA over genomic DNA, more? To maximize biological relevance we recommend isolating DNA under the same conditions as you are interested in or expect there to be a difference (stationary vs exponential growth; media choice; maintain antibiotic concentration; precondition cultures if reviving from frozen; do not grow/transfer more than required)Comparison of methodsin progressAgarose Gel Density | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > | Day 1: Reviving Strains
Day 2: Precondition Cultures
Day 3: Lyse cells and isolate DNA.
| |||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | Day 4: Gel electrophoresis.
Day 6: data analysis | |||||||
Next Generation SequencingqPCRseparate page describing method candidate for consolidation -- Main.DanielDeatherage - 11 Oct 2020 | ||||||||
Plasmid copy number determinationPlasmid copy number is known to vary depending on origin of replication and culture conditions [refs]. Typically, plasmids are referred to in qualitative terms such as "High" "Low" "Single" copy yet the quantitative value can be altered with only slight/single bp changes in the origin of replication [refs] and dramatically alter both the per cell and population yield of other products coded on the plasmid [refs]. Here we describe 3 methods used in our lab and discuss advantages and disadvantages of each.OverviewRegardless of what method of is used to evaluate the plasmid copy number, all methods are limited by the DNA extraction, and biological relevance of the sample when the DNA is extracted. To minimize bias in DNA extraction we recommend: never using a "plasmid prep" kit as these kits strongly favor isolation of plasmid DNA over genomic DNA, more? To maximize biological relevance we recommend isolating DNA under the same conditions as you are interested in or expect there to be a difference (stationary vs exponential growth; media choice; maintain antibiotic concentration; precondition cultures if reviving from frozen; do not grow/transfer more than required)Comparison of methodsin progressAgarose Gel Density
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
Batching samples -- Be sure to run each biological replicate on separate gel, unless number of samples so low as to fit all samples on single gel.
-- When working with individual samples in other steps, order based on sample ID not based on replicate. Sample 1-12 replicate A sample 1-12 replicate B and so on.
Next Generation SequencingqPCRseparate page describing method candidate for consolidation -- Main.DanielDeatherage - 11 Oct 2020 | ||||||||
Plasmid copy number determinationPlasmid copy number is known to vary depending on origin of replication and culture conditions [refs]. Typically, plasmids are referred to in qualitative terms such as "High" "Low" "Single" copy yet the quantitative value can be altered with only slight/single bp changes in the origin of replication [refs] and dramatically alter both the per cell and population yield of other products coded on the plasmid [refs]. Here we describe 3 methods used in our lab and discuss advantages and disadvantages of each.OverviewRegardless of what method of is used to evaluate the plasmid copy number, all methods are limited by the DNA extraction, and biological relevance of the sample when the DNA is extracted. To minimize bias in DNA extraction we recommend: never using a "plasmid prep" kit as these kits strongly favor isolation of plasmid DNA over genomic DNA, more? To maximize biological relevance we recommend isolating DNA under the same conditions as you are interested in or expect there to be a difference (stationary vs exponential growth; media choice; maintain antibiotic concentration; precondition cultures if reviving from frozen; do not grow/transfer more than required)Comparison of methodsin progressAgarose Gel Density
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Deleted: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
Next Generation SequencingqPCRseparate page describing method candidate for consolidation -- Main.DanielDeatherage - 11 Oct 2020 | ||||||||
Plasmid copy number determinationPlasmid copy number is known to vary depending on origin of replication and culture conditions [refs]. Typically, plasmids are referred to in qualitative terms such as "High" "Low" "Single" copy yet the quantitative value can be altered with only slight/single bp changes in the origin of replication [refs] and dramatically alter both the per cell and population yield of other products coded on the plasmid [refs]. Here we describe 3 methods used in our lab and discuss advantages and disadvantages of each.OverviewRegardless of what method of is used to evaluate the plasmid copy number, all methods are limited by the DNA extraction, and biological relevance of the sample when the DNA is extracted. To minimize bias in DNA extraction we recommend: never using a "plasmid prep" kit as these kits strongly favor isolation of plasmid DNA over genomic DNA, more? To maximize biological relevance we recommend isolating DNA under the same conditions as you are interested in or expect there to be a difference (stationary vs exponential growth; media choice; maintain antibiotic concentration; precondition cultures if reviving from frozen; do not grow/transfer more than required)Comparison of methodsin progressAgarose Gel Density
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | Batching samples -- Be sure to run each biological replicate on separate gel, unless number of samples so low as to fit all samples on single gel. -- When working with individual samples in other steps, order based on sample ID not based on replicate. Sample 1-12 replicate A sample 1-12 replicate B and so on. | |||||||
Next Generation SequencingqPCRseparate page describing method candidate for consolidation -- Main.DanielDeatherage - 11 Oct 2020 | ||||||||
Plasmid copy number determinationPlasmid copy number is known to vary depending on origin of replication and culture conditions [refs]. Typically, plasmids are referred to in qualitative terms such as "High" "Low" "Single" copy yet the quantitative value can be altered with only slight/single bp changes in the origin of replication [refs] and dramatically alter both the per cell and population yield of other products coded on the plasmid [refs]. Here we describe 3 methods used in our lab and discuss advantages and disadvantages of each. | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | %warn% note, this page is in progress, and requires additional information . | |||||||
| > > | ||||||||
OverviewRegardless of what method of is used to evaluate the plasmid copy number, all methods are limited by the DNA extraction, and biological relevance of the sample when the DNA is extracted. To minimize bias in DNA extraction we recommend: never using a "plasmid prep" kit as these kits strongly favor isolation of plasmid DNA over genomic DNA, more? | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | To maximize biological relevance we recommend isolating DNA under the same conditions as you are interested in or expect there to be a difference (stationary vs exponential growth; media choice; ) | |||||||
| > > | To maximize biological relevance we recommend isolating DNA under the same conditions as you are interested in or expect there to be a difference (stationary vs exponential growth; media choice; maintain antibiotic concentration; precondition cultures if reviving from frozen; do not grow/transfer more than required) | |||||||
Comparison of methodsin progress | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | ||||||||
| > > | Agarose Gel Density | |||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > |
Next Generation SequencingqPCRseparate page describing method candidate for consolidation | |||||||
| -- Main.DanielDeatherage - 11 Oct 2020 | ||||||||